After Caring Ends: Former Carers' Health, Work and Support After a Death

When the person they cared for dies, most family carers do not become ill. Many feel some relief, and their distress eases over the following months. A sizeable minority stay unwell, though, and the strain of caring before the death is one of the best guides to who will be among them. Support is built mainly around the time before the death, and it tends to stop when the death comes.

For someone who has cared for a partner, parent or child through a long illness, the death ends two things at once: a relationship, and a role that may have filled every day and night for years. The house goes quiet. The appointments, the medicines and the night-time checks stop. Some former carers have given up work or savings along the way, and have to rebuild a working life, a social life and a sense of who they are, while they are grieving. This study brings together what research from Denmark, Germany, the United States, the UK, Australia and Singapore shows about that period, and where the evidence runs out.

For many carers, the death eases a strain as well as bringing grief

The best-known study of this transition followed 217 family carers of people with dementia in the United States. In the year before the death, half spent at least 46 hours a week helping with daily tasks, and more than half said they felt “on duty” 24 hours a day. Their depressive symptoms were high while they were caring. Within three months of the death those symptoms had fallen to a clinically significant degree, and within a year they were substantially lower than during caring. Seventy-two percent said the death was a relief to them, and more than 90 percent believed it was a relief to the person who died^[3].

Relief is not the absence of grief, and it is not a lack of love: it reflects how heavy the final period of caring often was. The Danish national study points the same way. Among 2,215 carers of people with a terminal illness who completed a follow-up questionnaire, levels of grief and depressive symptoms were higher before the death than six months after it^[1]. A UK survey of 991 former carers found the same mixed picture: 51% said their physical health had improved since caring stopped and 53% said their mental health had improved, while 33% said their physical health and 35% their mental health had got worse^[2]. That survey drew on people who answered a carers’ charity’s annual questionnaire, so it describes its respondents rather than all former carers.

A minority stay unwell, and the strain of caring helps predict who

Averages hide very different paths. A US study comparing 49 former spousal carers of people with cognitive impairment with 42 current carers and 52 people who had not been carers found that former carers’ depression and loneliness did not return to the levels of non-carers, and stayed similar to current carers’ up to three years after caring stopped; social support was among the most consistent predictors of how they fared^[4]. Another, which followed 291 spouses and adult children of people with Alzheimer’s disease for up to five years, found four distinct patterns of depressive symptoms after the death. Two-thirds stayed at a steady, medium level of symptoms; about one in five improved over time; smaller groups stayed at steadily low or steadily high levels. “Role overload” while caring before the death substantially increased the odds of an unfavourable path afterwards. Self-esteem and emotional support were protective^[5].

The Danish study, the largest of the carer cohorts here, measured carers before and after the death. After adjustment for other factors, severe grief symptoms before the death went with 3.8 times the odds of complicated grief or depressive symptoms afterwards, and depressive symptoms before the death with 5.6 times the odds. Being the person’s partner (2.2 times the odds) and having a lower level of education (2.0 times) also predicted poorer outcomes^[1]. In a German study of 160 carers of people with advanced cancer, six months after a stay on a specialist palliative care ward, 82% reported clinically relevant distress, 27% moderate or severe anxiety symptoms and 35% moderate or severe depressive symptoms; having been the carer before the death was associated with about twice the odds of high distress afterwards (odds ratio 2.2)^[6]. These are odds ratios from observational studies: they show who is at higher risk, not that caring itself causes the outcome.

Grief is a normal response to a death, and most of these carers were grieving rather than ill. Prolonged grief disorder is a distinct, diagnosable condition. In a US study of 86 carers of people with advanced cancer, 16% met its criteria around six months after the death, and it was associated with poorer quality of life and with suicidal thoughts^[7]. That is a reason for services to stay in contact after a death, not a prediction for any one person. The same study found that most carers with the condition had not used mental health services, a gap the next sections return to.

England’s national Health Survey adds a population view. Of 7,606 adults who answered its end-of-life questions, 583 (8%) were bereaved carers. Among bereaved carers, those who said they would not be willing to care again had lower mental wellbeing scores than those who would (48.3 against 51.4 on the Warwick-Edinburgh scale); the authors stress that the survey cannot show cause and effect^[8]. Carers of people who die after a long illness are often also the partners of the person who died; the wider evidence on widowhood in later life is in our study of older widowed people.

Losing the role: loneliness, sleep and “learning to live again”

Former carers describe the end of caring as a loss in its own right, separate from the death. In the UK survey, 32% said support to cope with the loss of their caring role would have helped, and 47% said support with loneliness and reconnecting with family and friends would have helped^[2]. A prospective US study of 193 older spouses, assessed before the death and at six and 18 months after it, found that every group except highly stressed carers saw their social activity and support improve after bereavement, suggesting that people coming out of the most demanding caring may be most at risk of isolation^[9]. The same study found that an unexpected death, rather than caring, was associated with marked increases in depression.

Small qualitative studies fill in what the numbers cannot. In interviews with eight former carers of people with dementia in the US, sleep disturbance persisted for as long as ten years after caring ended, and carers described a period of “learning to live again”, with a reluctance to give up the caring role “after years of identifying with the caregiver role”^[10]. Eight people cannot tell us how common this is, but they show the questions larger studies have rarely asked: about sleep, identity and physical health beyond the first year.

Work and money after caring are among the least measured outcomes

Caring often costs people paid work. In the US dementia study, more than half the carers had had to end or reduce employment because of caring^[3]. What happens to that work after the death is much less studied. In the UK survey, 41% of former carers were retired and 36% were in work they had kept while caring; 8% had started or resumed work since caring ended, 8% could not work because of sickness or disability, and 5% were unemployed and looking for work. Twenty percent said they were struggling to make ends meet, and 35% that their finances had got worse since caring, while 38% said they were better able to afford utility bills. Fourteen percent said help returning to paid work would have been useful, rising to 21% of those aged 18 to 65^[2].

Income support for carers can end soon after the death. In Australia, someone receiving Carer Payment is paid through a 14-week bereavement period, “in which time they will need to test their eligibility for another income support payment”^[11]. Official statistics rarely follow carers through this change. In 2026, Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower told its parliament that it had no data on how long former carers take to return to work; around 1 in 4 residents who had been outside the labour force mainly because of caring returned to work within two years, and around 8 in 10 of those who did not had no intention of seeking work^[12]. Those figures cover everyone whose caring changed, not only people whose relative died. We found no national statistics, in any country, that track employment and income after the death of the person cared for. The wider picture of grief at work is in our study of bereavement and work.

Support is built around the death, and tends to stop at it

Palliative and hospice care is the main route through which carers are offered bereavement support, and it reaches some deaths far more than others. In an Australian survey of 506 people bereaved by a terminal illness, palliative care had reached people with cancer (64%) far more than people with heart disease, dementia or organ failure (4–10%). Only 39.4% said they had been asked about their own emotional distress before the death, about half felt they had enough support from the palliative care service, and a quarter were contacted again at six months^[13]. Respondents were recruited through funeral providers’ client lists by university researchers.

Where support is offered, many carers do not take it up. In a US hospice cohort of 161 carers of people with cancer, about 30% used bereavement services in the year after the death; even among those with major depressive disorder, fewer than half (47.6%) did, most often because they felt services were not needed or would not help^[14]. In the study of prolonged grief, the only factor that predicted carers using mental health services after the death was having discussed psychological concerns with a health professional while the person was still alive^[7]. Good end-of-life care may matter beyond the patient: in a US study that matched 30,838 older couples in which the spouse who died had used hospice with similar couples in which they had not, 4.9% of wives whose husband had used hospice died within 18 months of being widowed, against 5.4% of those whose husband had not (odds ratio 0.92); for husbands the difference was smaller and not statistically significant^[15].

What the evidence asks of us

The clearest message from this evidence is that support for former carers starts before the death. The US dementia study concluded that “intervention and support services were needed most before the patient’s death”^[3]; the Danish study, that systematic assessment of carers’ grief and depression before the death could identify those who need targeted support^[1]; and the prolonged grief study, that connecting carers with services while the person is alive may help^[7]. Australian clinical guidelines treat support for family carers, “including bereavement follow-up”, as “a core function of palliative care”^[16], and the Australian survey suggests practice still falls short of that^[13].

For services, funders and policymakers, the figures point to a few practical things:

• Ask carers how they are, before the death. Pre-death grief, depression and overload are the strongest predictors found, and they can be asked about.
• Reach carers outside cancer care. Carers of people with dementia, heart failure or organ failure are far less likely to have a palliative care team to follow them up.
• Keep contact going past the funeral. Follow-up at six months reached only a quarter of bereaved people in Australia.
• Treat the end of caring as a work and money transition. In Australia, Carer Payment ends 14 weeks after the death, and we found no country that measures what happens to former carers’ employment and income.
• Count former carers. Carers’ surveys and national statistics could routinely ask whether, and how, someone’s caring ended.

Language: this piece uses plain words such as “died” rather than euphemisms, because they are clearer. Where it discusses suicide, it follows the Samaritans’ media guidelines.

Why we're publishing this

Carers’ organisations have long said that support for carers too often ends on the day the person they care for dies. The research supports them. It shows that the end of caring is a transition with its own health, social and financial effects, that those effects are uneven, and that the people most likely to struggle can often be recognised before the death. We have gathered the evidence in one place, with every figure linked to its source, so that organisations working with carers and former carers can cite it in their own case for better support.

How to read this data

Most of this evidence comes from cohort studies that followed carers from before a death to some months or years after it, in Denmark, Germany and the United States; most involve carers of people with dementia or cancer, and carers of people with other conditions are under-studied. The Danish study is the largest and was drawn from a national register of people with a terminal illness, but only 38% of carers who were sent questionnaires responded^[1]. Several studies are small (8 to 161 people) and recruited through particular hospitals, hospices or palliative care wards. The UK and Australian figures come from surveys with self-selected respondents, and describe those respondents, not all former carers^[2][13]. The figures for England come from a cross-sectional national survey, which cannot show cause and effect^[8].

Odds ratios describe the odds of an outcome in one group compared with another; they are not the same as risks, and the studies adjusted for some factors but not all. Different studies used different measures of grief and depression at different times after the death, so their percentages are not directly comparable. Work and money after caring are the weakest part of the evidence: we found no official statistics, anywhere, that follow former carers’ employment and income after the death of the person they cared for.

Use this data

Free to cite with attribution to Understanding Bereavement. Carers’ organisations, palliative care services, researchers and journalists are welcome to reuse these figures and charts. For the underlying figures as a spreadsheet, get in touch.

Important: This study summarises published research about groups of people for general information. It is not medical advice or bereavement support, and it cannot describe or predict anything about an individual carer or family. If you are worried about yourself or someone else, please speak to a GP or another qualified professional.

Sources

1. Nielsen MK, Neergaard MA, Jensen AB, Vedsted P, Bro F, Guldin MB. Predictors of complicated grief and depression in bereaved caregivers: a nationwide prospective cohort study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2017. europepmc.org/article/MED/28042073
2. Carers UK. The experiences of former carers: a Carers UK research report. Carers UK, 2023. carersuk.org/media/wcuhsnts/former-carers-report_final.pdf
3. Schulz R, Mendelsohn AB, Haley WE, et al. End-of-life care and the effects of bereavement on family caregivers of persons with dementia. New England Journal of Medicine, 2003. europepmc.org/article/MED/14614169
4. Robinson-Whelen S, Tada Y, MacCallum RC, McGuire L, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Long-term caregiving: what happens when it ends? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2001. europepmc.org/article/MED/11727947
5. Aneshensel CS, Botticello AL, Yamamoto-Mitani N. When caregiving ends: the course of depressive symptoms after bereavement. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 2004. europepmc.org/article/MED/15869114
6. Oechsle K, Ullrich A, Marx G, et al. Prevalence and predictors of distress, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in bereaved family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 2020. europepmc.org/article/MED/31596115
7. Lichtenthal WG, Nilsson M, Kissane DW, et al. Underutilization of mental health services among bereaved caregivers with prolonged grief disorder. Psychiatric Services, 2011. europepmc.org/article/MED/21969652
8. Hodiamont F, Allgar V, Currow DC, Johnson MJ. Mental wellbeing in bereaved carers: a Health Survey for England population study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2022. europepmc.org/article/MED/31492672
9. Burton AM, Haley WE, Small BJ. Bereavement after caregiving or unexpected death: effects on elderly spouses. Aging & Mental Health, 2006. europepmc.org/article/MED/16777661
10. Corey KL, McCurry MK. When caregiving ends: the experiences of former family caregivers of people with dementia. The Gerontologist, 2018. europepmc.org/article/MED/28064236
11. Services Australia. Death of a care receiver where Carer Payment (CP) is received (operational guideline 009-03090010). Services Australia, 2026. operational.servicesaustralia.gov.au/public/Pages/carers/009-03090010-01.html
12. Ministry of Manpower, Singapore. Written answer to parliamentary question on time taken for caregivers to return to workforce. Ministry of Manpower, 2026. mom.gov.sg/newsroom/parliament-questions-and-replies/2026/0302-…
13. Aoun SM, Rumbold B, Howting D, Bolleter A, Breen LJ. Bereavement support for family caregivers: the gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care. PLoS ONE, 2017. europepmc.org/article/MED/28977013
14. Cherlin EJ, Barry CL, Prigerson HG, et al. Bereavement services for family caregivers: how often used, why, and why not. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 2007. europepmc.org/article/MED/17298263
15. Christakis NA, Iwashyna TJ. The health impact of health care on families: a matched cohort study of hospice use by decedents and mortality outcomes in surviving, widowed spouses. Social Science & Medicine, 2003. europepmc.org/article/MED/12791489
16. Hudson P, Remedios C, Zordan R, et al. Guidelines for the psychosocial and bereavement support of family caregivers of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 2012. europepmc.org/article/MED/22385026